Page 1 of 1
Is it unreasonable ?
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:20 am
by k4ghz
I was purchasing a amplifier, but the seller did not want to give his street address or telephone number, only a P.O. Box. I have a real problem sending cash to a P.O Box...is that unreasonable??
I do not send to po boxs
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:40 pm
by GERM37
I have a rule that I live by I do not send money to po box's for any reason.
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:15 pm
by KC0UKR
If you feel uncortable for any reason at all about a deal,as a buyer nothing is unreasonable.
The buyer takes all of the risks so why would a seller not try to ease any reservations the buyer has?
I will not EVER buy from someone without speaking first on the phone.
No legitimate seller could refuse this condition and I will not make an exception.
Ed
Re: Is it unreasonable ?
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:08 pm
by n5wrx
k4ghz wrote:I was purchasing a amplifier, but the seller did not want to give his street address or telephone number, only a P.O. Box. I have a real problem sending cash to a P.O Box...is that unreasonable??
No Doubt you have saved youreself some money and a lot of frustration.
When to reject and eject...
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:23 pm
by K4ICL
Don't want to be skinned, robbed, cheated, scammed, bilked, abused by an Internet deal?
Rule No. 1 (Also known as RED FLAG No. 1):
Anytime a Seller or a Buyer refuses to provide you with reasonable verifiable contact information (Name, Callsign, Physical Address, Telephone Number, Email address, etc.) reject and eject the deal and move on.
ship to a p. o. box ??
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:57 pm
by ddurgin
I live here in a very rural area on big island Hawaii. There is no postal delivery here. We only have p o boxes. Sorry I don't live within walking distance of a post office, like I guess everyone in America does..... But I do have a telephone, and I do speak English, so I guess if you're to lazy to call, or have me call you, then keep moving, and to heck with you. Also, keep your traffic jams to yourself.